BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//jEvents 2.0 for Joomla//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Rome
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251026T020000
RDATE:20260329T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:Europe/Rome CET
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20261025T020000
RDATE:20270328T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:Europe/Rome CET
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20271031T020000
RDATE:20280326T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:Europe/Rome CET
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20281029T020000
RDATE:20290325T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:Europe/Rome CET
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20291028T020000
RDATE:20300331T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:Europe/Rome CET
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20301027T020000
RDATE:20310330T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:Europe/Rome CET
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20311026T020000
RDATE:20320328T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:Europe/Rome CET
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250902T090000
RDATE:20251026T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:Europe/Rome CEST
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20260329T030000
RDATE:20261025T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:Europe/Rome CEST
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20270328T030000
RDATE:20271031T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:Europe/Rome CEST
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20280326T030000
RDATE:20281029T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:Europe/Rome CEST
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20290325T030000
RDATE:20291028T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:Europe/Rome CEST
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20300331T030000
RDATE:20301027T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:Europe/Rome CEST
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20310330T030000
RDATE:20311026T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:Europe/Rome CEST
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:3375c2923807815866f1a235b607d341
CATEGORIES:Call for papers
CREATED:20260903T123817
SUMMARY:CFP: Thematic Issue - Canonizations and Ruptures: Scientific Uses of the History of Philosophy, Science in Context (Cambridge University Press)
DESCRIPTION:CFP: Thematic Issue - Canonizations and Ruptures: Scientific Uses of the Hi
 story of Philosophy, Science in Context (Cambridge University Press) Themat
 ic Issue: Canonizations and Ruptures: Scientific Uses of the History of Phi
 losophy Science in Context (Cambridge University Press)\n\nGuest Editors: M
 arco Tamborini (Pegaso University), Andrea Gentili (Albert Ludwig Universit
 y of Freiburg / Università degli Studi di Padova)\n\nPhysicists, biologists
 , mathematicians, neuroscientists, and social theorists continually constru
 ct narratives about the philosophical tradition. They invoke Aristotle or K
 ant, declare certain metaphysics obsolete, and rewrite rationalism or empir
 icism to demarcate their own field. This issue takes such practices serious
 ly as epistemic acts: when scientists reconstruct a past philosopher, they 
 build conceptual genealogies and actively shape the canonization or margina
 lization of authors within the history of philosophy.\n\nThe guiding hypoth
 esis is that the history of philosophy is a space of conceptual operations 
 shared between philosophers and scientists, with direct implications for th
 e development, stabilization, and transformation of scientific knowledge. W
 e invite contributions addressing questions such as: What is the epistemic 
 status of the philosophical genealogies produced by scientists? How do they
  shape the reception of philosophers within and beyond scientific communiti
 es? Can a sharp separation between history of philosophy and history of sci
 ence still be defended? Who has the authority to narrate the philosophical 
 past, and under what conditions does that narration become normative for a 
 research field?\n\nWe welcome case studies across scientific disciplines an
 d historical periods examining the epistemic, institutional, and theoretica
 l function of such historical readings.\n\nExpected date of completion: all
  papers submitted by February 2027\n\nIf interested, please send an abstrac
 t of approximately 750 words to the Guest Editors:  Andrea Gentili — Questo
  indirizzo email è protetto dagli spambots. È necessario abilitare JavaScri
 pt per vederlo. &amp; Marco Tamborini — Questo indirizzo email è protetto d
 agli spambots. È necessario abilitare JavaScript per vederlo.\n
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<div>CFP: Thematic Issue - Canonizations and Ruptures: Scientific Uses of t
 he History of Philosophy, Science in Context (Cambridge University Press)</
 div><div><strong> </strong></div><p><strong>Thematic Issue</strong>: Canoni
 zations and Ruptures: Scientific Uses of the History of Philosophy <em>Scie
 nce in Context</em> (Cambridge University Press)<br /><br /><strong>Guest E
 ditors</strong>: Marco Tamborini (Pegaso University), Andrea Gentili (Alber
 t Ludwig University of Freiburg / Università degli Studi di Padova)<br /><b
 r />Physicists, biologists, mathematicians, neuroscientists, and social the
 orists continually construct narratives about the philosophical tradition. 
 They invoke Aristotle or Kant, declare certain metaphysics obsolete, and re
 write rationalism or empiricism to demarcate their own field. This issue ta
 kes such practices seriously as epistemic acts: when scientists reconstruct
  a past philosopher, they build conceptual genealogies and actively shape t
 he canonization or marginalization of authors within the history of philoso
 phy.<br /><br />The guiding hypothesis is that the history of philosophy is
  a space of conceptual operations shared between philosophers and scientist
 s, with direct implications for the development, stabilization, and transfo
 rmation of scientific knowledge. We invite contributions addressing questio
 ns such as: What is the epistemic status of the philosophical genealogies p
 roduced by scientists? How do they shape the reception of philosophers with
 in and beyond scientific communities? Can a sharp separation between histor
 y of philosophy and history of science still be defended? Who has the autho
 rity to narrate the philosophical past, and under what conditions does that
  narration become normative for a research field?<br /><br />We welcome cas
 e studies across scientific disciplines and historical periods examining th
 e epistemic, institutional, and theoretical function of such historical rea
 dings.<br /><br /><strong>Expected date of completion</strong>: all papers 
 submitted by <strong>February 2027</strong><br /><br />If interested, pleas
 e send an abstract of approximately <strong>750 words</strong> to the Guest
  Editors:  Andrea Gentili — <joomla-hidden-mail  is-link="1" is-email="1" f
 irst="YW5kcmVhLmdlbnRpbGkuMg==" last="cGhkLnVuaXBkLml0" text="YW5kcmVhLmdlb
 nRpbGkuMkBwaGQudW5pcGQuaXQ=" base=""  target="_blank" rel="noopener">Questo
  indirizzo email è protetto dagli spambots. È necessario abilitare JavaScri
 pt per vederlo.</joomla-hidden-mail> &amp; Marco Tamborini — <joomla-hidden
 -mail  is-link="1" is-email="1" first="bWFyY28udGFtYm9yaW5p" last="dW5pcGVn
 YXNvLml0" text="bWFyY28udGFtYm9yaW5pQHVuaXBlZ2Fzby5pdA==" base=""  target="
 _blank" rel="noopener">Questo indirizzo email è protetto dagli spambots. È 
 necessario abilitare JavaScript per vederlo.</joomla-hidden-mail></p>
CONTACT:Questo indirizzo email è protetto dagli spambots. È necessario abilitare JavaScript per vederlo.
DTSTAMP:20261023T160813
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260903T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260903T170000
SEQUENCE:0
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR